From this report, I may ask myself where I can really share my deeply inside feelings? If I created a blog for myself as the place where I can express my personal feelings. However, most of us have our feelings after we felt someone or something. Then, the comments or opinions may depend on the person or thing you encountered. Saying good experiences with them, you may let others feel good if the person read your blog. How about say bad feelings toward things related to the person? If the person read the blog and found that you were pointing to him or her, what would be the consequences?
If people look for jobs and the HR people search on blogs to verify the applicants, what would be the consequences?
What does it mean "be yourself" When we can be ourselves, how about others?
It is quite interesting to know that we are still struggling how to be ourselves after we get the degree from the academic. Thus, think of "attitude."
8成履歷 看過就忘 新鮮人態度 勝出關鍵
http://news.chinatimes.com/2007Cti/2007Cti-Focus/2007Cti-Focus-Content/0,4518,9806110031+0+0+1+0,00,focus.html
Service experiences
Service experiences
1 則留言:
「因為蘇菲小姐的教導，使我一生懂得欣賞工藝，看到乾淨俐落的作品不禁為之心喜，並尊重這樣的技藝。至今，我仍記得蘇菲小姐把她的手放在我手上，引導我感覺那順著紋路刨平而且用砂紙磨光的木材。愛莎小姐教給我的是工作紀律與組織能力。」
「上帝造出來的人都會犯下各式各樣的錯誤。不要從別人的錯誤中學習，看看別人是怎麼做對的。」管理大師彼得杜拉克，在著作《旁觀者 ─ 懷恩師》，引述從猶太智者所言得到的啟發。網路暢通無阻與紛擾的今天，如同遵守公共秩序與應有的公德心一樣，每個人在自己部落格抒發己見，做自己，絕對是個人自由；然而，尤其受過教育的知識分子，我們是否在更高的認知中，學著善用可貴的網路資源、學著尊重別人、學著透過思考與筆耕，提昇自己。若只知一眛地抱怨、無端地謾罵，卻不懂回頭檢視自己，此舉只會凸顯個人的膚淺與無知罷了。試問：這一個「做自己」意義為何？這種無知的率性，意義在哪裡？
「言多必失」，說話的藝術與涵養需要學習，願共勉精進。同時共勉：多用一點「心」、善用我們的「耳與靈魂之窗」多聽多讀多看、善用我們的「手」多做多學。「聽其言，而後觀其行」一個人的價值在於「做」(成就)了些什麼，而非「說」了些什麼。
管理大師彼得杜拉克為我們樹立了懷恩師的最佳典範、2009年蕭邦鋼琴大賽得主，日本全盲年輕人Nobuyuki Tsujii克服障礙，用自己的努力，彈奏出生命的光輝。唯有經歷永不止歇的努力，才是「做自己」的真諦。
張貼留言